Article image

The Digital Crown and the Contagious Youth Revolt

The Mirage of Peace in Gaza's Second Act

Sunday, 19 October 2025 22:21

Abstract

A massive, youth-led protest movement, known as 'No Kings,' has swept across the United States, challenging the perceived authoritarian drift of President Donald Trump's administration. The political confrontation escalated dramatically following the President's decision to post an AI-generated video on social media, which depicted him dropping a brown, faecal-like substance onto the demonstrators from a fighter jet. This digital provocation coincided with the administration's renewed threats to deploy federal troops to American cities under the Insurrection Act, marking a new and volatile phase in the conflict between the executive branch and its domestic opposition.

Historical Context

Recent Findings

A Second Day of Defiance

Millions of Americans took to the streets on Saturday, October 18, 2025, for the second major national demonstration organised by the 'No Kings' movement2,3,10. Organisers estimated that more than seven million people participated in the nationwide rallies3,5,6,10. The protests spanned all 50 US states3,5,14, encompassing over 2,700 separate events in cities and towns across the country3,10,13. The demonstrations were a direct response to what the coalition of activist groups described as the Trump administration’s expansion of executive power and an erosion of democratic norms8,10,13. The movement’s name, 'No Kings,' is a symbolic rejection of the idea of an unchecked, supreme authority in the United States10,17. The core message, prominently displayed on the movement’s website, is that 'America has no kings, and the power belongs to the people'3,17. Participants were encouraged to wear yellow, a colour intended to symbolise unity and peaceful resistance, drawing inspiration from global democratic struggles such as the Yellow Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong15. The protests were largely peaceful, with police and organisers reporting no major incidents or arrests6.

The Digital Escalation

The political tension surrounding the mass demonstrations was dramatically amplified by a social media post from President Donald Trump4,5. Late on the Saturday evening of the protests, the President shared an AI-generated video on his Truth Social platform4,5. The clip depicted a digitally altered version of the President, wearing a crown, piloting a fighter jet that was emblazoned with the words 'King Trump'2,3,4,5. As the jet soared over a massive crowd of demonstrators, which appeared to be in New York City’s Times Square, it released a torrent of brown sludge or liquid onto the people below3,4,5,6. The video was set to the 1986 Kenny Loggins song 'Danger Zone'2,3,4,5. The content was widely interpreted as a crude and aggressive response to the 'No Kings' movement, with some sources describing the brown liquid as resembling faeces4,5. The video also appeared to single out specific critics, with footage of left-wing influencer Harry Sisson being melded into the AI spectacle6. The White House further mocked the opposition in a separate social media post that juxtaposed an image of President Trump and Vice President JD Vance wearing crowns with an altered depiction of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wearing sombreros3,5,6. This post was captioned with the phrase, 'We’re built different'3,5. The administration’s use of AI-generated content for political satire and attack was not unprecedented; the President had previously shared a racist AI-generated video aimed at Minority Leaders Schumer and Jeffries in September2,5.

The Authoritarianism Charge

The 'No Kings' movement originated earlier in the year, with the first major day of action taking place on June 14, 20259,11. That date was chosen specifically because it coincided with the U.S. Army’s 250th Anniversary Parade in Washington, D.C., and President Trump’s 79th birthday9,11,12. The initial protest, which drew over five million participants across more than 2,100 cities and towns, was intended to highlight concerns over militarism, the spectacle of power, and the consolidation of executive authority8,9,10,11. The movement is a coalition of over 250 advocacy organisations17, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), MoveOn, Indivisible, and the 50501 Movement9,11,12,17. The protests are a direct challenge to the administration’s policies, which critics argue include a crackdown on immigration, restrictions on press freedom, and the deployment of federal forces in American cities8,15. Progressive Senator Bernie Sanders, addressing a crowd near the U.S. Capitol, warned that the American experiment was 'in danger' under a president who sought 'more and more power in his own hands'14,16. The movement has also garnered support from cultural figures, with celebrities such as Jamie Lee Curtis and Ben Stiller speaking out in favour of the demonstrations1.

The Threat of Federal Intervention

The administration’s response to the protests extended beyond digital mockery to include the threat of military deployment. President Trump reaffirmed his belief that he possessed 'unquestioned power' to deploy the National Guard under the Insurrection Act7,19. The Insurrection Act is a centuries-old law that permits a president to deploy troops on U.S. soil for domestic law enforcement purposes under extraordinary circumstances7. The President indicated that San Francisco would be the next city to face federal intervention, stating that the city had 'went woke' and needed to be made 'safe'7,19. This threat followed previous deployments of the National Guard and immigration agents to other Democratic-led cities, including Los Angeles, Chicago, Memphis, and Washington, D.C.7. The legality of these deployments has been challenged; a federal judge had previously ruled that the Los Angeles deployment violated the Posse Comitatus Act, a federal law that generally prohibits the use of the military for domestic law enforcement7. The President’s remarks were made during an interview that aired on Fox News’ 'Sunday Morning Futures'7. The administration’s actions were further seen as politically retaliatory when the White House announced a pause on $11 billion in infrastructure projects in cities such as San Francisco, New York, and Baltimore, citing budget constraints7. Republican lawmakers, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, dismissed the 'No Kings' demonstrations, labelling them as 'Hate America' rallies4,5,14,16. The protests also occurred amid a government shutdown, which was in its third week, with some Republicans accusing Democrats of prolonging the legislative deadlock to align with the protests4,8,14,16.

The Global Echo of Discontent

The 'No Kings' movement, while primarily focused on domestic American politics, has resonated internationally, reflecting a broader global concern over democratic backsliding9,11. Solidarity events, sometimes labelled 'No Tyrants' or 'No Dictators' protests, were organised by groups like Indivisible Abroad and Democrats Abroad in various locations around the world9,16. Small protests took place in cities such as Malaga, Spain, and Malmo, Sweden14. The international chapters of Indivisible led the organising efforts for Americans abroad, adapting the name in countries with constitutional monarchies to maintain the focus on the Trump administration’s perceived authoritarianism9. The movement’s organisers, including the 50501 Movement, have cited the '3.5% rule,' a theory suggesting that if 3.5 per cent of a population becomes involved in a movement, significant political change can be achieved11. The sheer scale of the October 18 demonstrations, with over seven million participants, underscored the depth of public concern and the movement’s ability to mobilise a significant portion of the population3,5,10. The protests, which included a large presence of young people, highlighted a generational fear for the future of American democracy14.

Conclusion

The 'No Kings' protests of October 2025 represent a critical juncture in the political landscape, demonstrating the capacity of a youth-driven, digitally-savvy movement to mobilise millions against the executive branch3,10,13. The administration’s response, characterised by the President’s use of a bizarre, AI-generated video to mock and degrade the demonstrators, signifies a new and aggressive form of political communication that leverages deepfake technology for partisan warfare4,5,6. Simultaneously, the renewed threat to invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy federal troops to American cities underscores the administration’s willingness to escalate the confrontation from the digital sphere to the physical streets7,19. The convergence of mass civil disobedience, unprecedented digital provocation, and the specter of military intervention in domestic affairs has created a volatile political environment, forcing a national debate on the limits of presidential power and the fundamental principles of American democracy7,10,13.

References

  1. Hollywood shows out for ‘No Kings’ protests: Jamie Lee Curtis and Ben Stiller among celebrities speaking out

    Supports the inclusion of Jamie Lee Curtis and Ben Stiller as celebrities supporting the protests.

  2. President Donald Trump Fires Back at 'No Kings Day' by Posting AI Video of Himself Bombing Protesters with Brown Liquid

    Verifies the date of the AI video post (October 19, 2025), the content (brown sludge/liquid), the platform (Truth Social), and the music ('Danger Zone').

  3. Trump responds to 'No Kings' protests with AI-generated video

    Confirms the date (October 18, 2025), the scale (over 7 million, 2,700 events, all 50 states), the video details (crown, 'King Trump' jet, Times Square), the core message, and the White House's 'We're built different' post.

  4. Trump Literally Takes A S**t On 'No Kings' Protesters In Wild AI Video

    Details the AI video content (brown sludge/feces, 'KING TRUMP' jet, 'Danger Zone' song) and the timing (late Saturday post).

  5. Trump Posts Bizarre AI Video of Himself Bombing 'No Kings' Protesters With Brown Sludge

    Confirms the AI video details (crown, 'King Trump' jet, brown liquid/feces, 'Danger Zone'), the scale (seven million people, all 50 states), the White House's second post, and the Republican 'hate America' rally label.

  6. Trump's AI Video Stirs Controversy Amid Historic 'No Kings' Protests

    Verifies the AI video content (crowned fighter pilot, dropping sewage/sludge), the scale (up to 7 million participants), the peaceful nature of the protests, and the singling out of influencer Harry Sisson.

  7. Trump claims 'unquestioned power' to deploy troops to San Francisco under Insurrection Act

    Supports the President's claim of 'unquestioned power' under the Insurrection Act, the threat to deploy troops to San Francisco, previous deployments (Los Angeles, Chicago, Memphis, D.C.), the Posse Comitatus Act violation, and the pause on $11 billion in infrastructure projects.

  8. Millions Expected to Rally Across US in 'No Kings Day' Protests Against Trump

    Provides context on the first protest (four months prior, over five million participants), the organisers (Indivisible, 50501 Movement), the reason (expansion of executive power, authoritarian power grabs), and the government shutdown context.

  9. No Kings protests - Wikipedia

    Details the dates (June 14, 2025, and October 18, 2025), the cause (Army parade, Trump's birthday, authoritarian policies), the organisers (50501, Indivisible, 200+ groups), the turnout (over five million in June), and the international 'No Tyrants' name.

  10. Costumes, drums, and chants: 'No Kings' protests sweep US; why are millions marching against Trump?

    Confirms the date of the first protest (June 14), the second protest ('No Kings II'), the scale (nearly seven million, 2,700 cities), and the symbolic meaning of the name (rejecting unchecked authority).

  11. No Kings protests | Meaning, Turnout, Numbers, & Around the World | Britannica

    Provides the date of the first protest (June 14, 2025), the turnout (five million), the number of sites (2,100), the organisers (50501 Movement, ACLU, MoveOn), the '3.5% rule' concept, and the international 'No Tyrants' name.

  12. What is No Kings protest? What's the objective and what are protesters demanding?

    Confirms the date of the first protest (June 14), the organisers (ACLU, MoveOn, Indivisible), the core message, and the focus on opposing authoritarian moves.

  13. No Kings: what to know about the anti-Trump protests attracting millions

    Confirms the scale (millions, 2,700 locations), the message ('Donald Trump is not a king'), the opposition to increasing authoritarianism, and the militarised presence in US cities.

  14. Protesters out in force for anti-Trump 'No Kings' rallies across US

    Confirms the scale (huge crowds, all 50 states), the Republican 'Hate America' label, Senator Bernie Sanders' quote, the presence of a giant Trump diaper balloon in Los Angeles, and Trump's denial of being a king.

  15. 'No Kings' dress code revealed: Massive 'anti-Trump' demonstrations hit 2500 US locations- See if your city is on the map

    Details the number of locations (over 2,500), the reason (authoritarian practices, constitutional rights), and the instruction for participants to wear yellow, symbolising unity and peaceful resistance.

  16. 'No Kings' protests against Trump bring a street party vibe to cities nationwide

    Confirms the number of rallies (over 2,600), the presence of Senator Sanders, Trump's denial of being a king, and the international protest in Berlin.

  17. 'No Kings' rallies and marches planned across Bay Area. Here's what to know.

    Confirms the number of organising groups (over 250), the core message ('America has no kings'), the reason for the name (Trump acting like a monarch), and Trump's initial downplaying of the protests.

  18. The Contagious Gen Z Revolutions

    Used as a general source to verify the context of the 'Gen Z Revolutions' and the date of the article's publication.

  19. Politics - San Francisco Chronicle

    Reaffirms Trump's claim of 'unquestioned power' under the Insurrection Act and the indication that San Francisco would be the next city for federal intervention.